Scientist corrects Shroud of Turin story in the Raleigh News and Observer

From: Dating the shroud - A scientist responds to the story in the News and Observer

T. V. Oommen writes in a letter published by the paper:

I am responding to the Aug. 29 article “Scientists debate shroud’s date.” As a scientist involved in the shroud’s study and research, and as a participant in the recent Ohio Shroud Conference where I made a presentation on “Shroud coins dating by image extraction,” I can emphatically say that there is plenty of evidence for the antiquity of the shroud as of first century origin.

There were several presentations on the erroneous dating of the shroud by the 1988 radiocarbon(C-14) dating. The area where the samples were taken was from a medieval patch with cotton, which appeared to blend perfectly with the linen shroud. If this is true, the main body of the shroud should show an ancient date. The theory that the entire shroud could show a more recent date because of the newer carbon generated during fiery events remains to be proven.

Some other scientists also propose similar views; for example, that powerful radiations from the resurrection event must have generated C-14. So another carbon dating of the shroud may not resolve the issue.

The coin identification I presented showed Pontius Pilate coins issued AD 30/31 placed on the eye area, which implies the shroud’s age is very close to that. Read more about it at www.ohioshroudconference.com.

T.V. Oommen

Raleigh

Comments

[Sheena]

First I would like to start off and say, that is not my Lord and savior. They are saying they have all the blood marks of where the nails were entered in his hands. As well as the marks from the crown of thornes. Well if that is the case where is the blood marks of where the soliders stabbed Jesus' sides (by his rib cage)? Or all the marks where he was beaten by the flagra so brutely. Why is there only traces of his hands, feet, and head? Come on now. I'm sorry but this is ridiculous.